N Annual Review of Information Science and Technology Arist Vol 19 1984 161209

The prepare of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into iv equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (light-green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the 2d highest values, Q3 (orange) the tertiary highest values and Q4 (ruby-red) the lowest values.

Category Year Quartile
Data Systems 1999 Q1
Information Systems 2000 Q2
Information Systems 2001 Q2
Data Systems 2002 Q2
Information Systems 2003 Q1
Data Systems 2004 Q1
Information Systems 2005 Q1
Information Systems 2006 Q1
Information Systems 2007 Q1
Information Systems 2008 Q1
Information Systems 2009 Q1
Information Systems 2010 Q1
Data Systems 2011 Q1
Information Systems 2012 Q1
Information Systems 2013 Q1
Information Systems 2014 Q1
Library and Information Sciences 1999 Q1
Library and Information Sciences 2000 Q1
Library and Data Sciences 2001 Q1
Library and Information Sciences 2002 Q1
Library and Information Sciences 2003 Q1
Library and Information Sciences 2004 Q1
Library and Information Sciences 2005 Q1
Library and Information Sciences 2006 Q1
Library and Information Sciences 2007 Q1
Library and Information Sciences 2008 Q1
Library and Information Sciences 2009 Q1
Library and Information Sciences 2010 Q1
Library and Information Sciences 2011 Q1
Library and Information Sciences 2012 Q1
Library and Information Sciences 2013 Q1
Library and Information Sciences 2014 Q1

The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. Information technology is based on the thought that 'all citations are non created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average commodity in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.

Year SJR
1999 2.332
2000 0.422
2001 0.454
2002 0.566
2003 ane.718
2004 2.844
2005 2.215
2006 ii.012
2007 1.045
2008 1.513
2009 1.425
2010 1.634
2011 1.613
2012 i.488
2013 2.101
2014 one.446

Evolution of the number of published documents. All types of documents are considered, including citable and non citable documents.

Year Documents
1999 eight
2000 9
2001 0
2002 14
2003 12
2004 12
2005 xiv
2006 14
2007 16
2008 14
2009 xi
2010 13
2011 12
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0

This indicator counts the number of citations received past documents from a journal and divides them past the total number of documents published in that journal. The nautical chart shows the evolution of the boilerplate number of times documents published in a journal in the by 2, three and four years take been cited in the current year. The two years line is equivalent to journal impact gene ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.

Cites per document Year Value
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 1999 2.042
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2000 1.750
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2001 1.333
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2002 1.520
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2003 2.677
Cites / Physician. (4 years) 2004 4.057
Cites / Md. (4 years) 2005 4.711
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2006 4.019
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2007 3.827
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2008 3.732
Cites / Dr.. (four years) 2009 3.845
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2010 4.182
Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2011 4.537
Cites / Doc. (four years) 2012 iii.340
Cites / Doc. (four years) 2013 4.139
Cites / Dr.. (4 years) 2014 iv.360
Cites / Doc. (3 years) 1999 2.042
Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2000 1.250
Cites / Doctor. (iii years) 2001 0.600
Cites / Doc. (three years) 2002 0.941
Cites / Physician. (3 years) 2003 2.826
Cites / Medico. (three years) 2004 four.500
Cites / Dr.. (3 years) 2005 4.711
Cites / Doc. (iii years) 2006 3.974
Cites / Md. (iii years) 2007 ii.750
Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2008 3.455
Cites / Md. (3 years) 2009 three.977
Cites / Medico. (3 years) 2010 3.707
Cites / Md. (three years) 2011 3.368
Cites / Md. (iii years) 2012 3.111
Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2013 3.840
Cites / Doc. (three years) 2014 3.583
Cites / Doc. (two years) 1999 one.625
Cites / Medico. (ii years) 2000 0.938
Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2001 0.118
Cites / Doctor. (2 years) 2002 0.889
Cites / Doc. (two years) 2003 3.571
Cites / Doc. (ii years) 2004 4.500
Cites / Doc. (two years) 2005 4.292
Cites / Doctor. (ii years) 2006 2.231
Cites / Medico. (2 years) 2007 2.607
Cites / Medico. (2 years) 2008 3.367
Cites / Doc. (2 years) 2009 3.700
Cites / Physician. (2 years) 2010 2.640
Cites / Doctor. (two years) 2011 3.500
Cites / Physician. (two years) 2012 two.760
Cites / Md. (2 years) 2013 ii.583
Cites / Doc. (two years) 2014 0.000

Evolution of the full number of citations and periodical's self-citations received past a journal's published documents during the iii previous years.
Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a periodical citing commodity to articles published past the same journal.

Cites Year Value
Self Cites 1999 15
Self Cites 2000 6
Self Cites 2001 0
Self Cites 2002 2
Cocky Cites 2003 3
Self Cites 2004 25
Cocky Cites 2005 31
Self Cites 2006 twenty
Self Cites 2007 21
Cocky Cites 2008 16
Self Cites 2009 xix
Self Cites 2010 10
Self Cites 2011 four
Self Cites 2012 0
Self Cites 2013 0
Cocky Cites 2014 0
Total Cites 1999 49
Total Cites 2000 30
Full Cites 2001 15
Full Cites 2002 16
Total Cites 2003 65
Full Cites 2004 117
Full Cites 2005 179
Full Cites 2006 151
Total Cites 2007 110
Full Cites 2008 152
Full Cites 2009 175
Total Cites 2010 152
Total Cites 2011 128
Total Cites 2012 112
Total Cites 2013 96
Full Cites 2014 43

Evolution of the number of full citation per document and external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. External citations are calculated by subtracting the number of self-citations from the total number of citations received past the journal's documents.

Cites Year Value
External Cites per document 1999 i.417
External Cites per document 2000 one.000
External Cites per certificate 2001 0.600
External Cites per certificate 2002 0.824
External Cites per document 2003 ii.818
External Cites per certificate 2004 3.833
External Cites per document 2005 4.111
External Cites per certificate 2006 3.541
External Cites per certificate 2007 two.282
External Cites per document 2008 3.238
External Cites per document 2009 3.805
External Cites per certificate 2010 3.737
External Cites per certificate 2011 3.543
External Cites per document 2012 iii.394
External Cites per certificate 2013 4.174
External Cites per document 2014 3.909
Cites per document 1999 2.042
Cites per certificate 2000 1.250
Cites per document 2001 0.600
Cites per document 2002 0.941
Cites per document 2003 2.826
Cites per document 2004 4.500
Cites per document 2005 4.711
Cites per document 2006 iii.974
Cites per certificate 2007 two.750
Cites per document 2008 3.455
Cites per certificate 2009 3.977
Cites per certificate 2010 three.707
Cites per document 2011 3.368
Cites per certificate 2012 3.111
Cites per document 2013 3.840
Cites per document 2014 3.583

International Collaboration accounts for the manufactures that have been produced past researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal'south documents signed by researchers from more than ane country; that is including more than one country address.

Year International Collaboration
1999 0.00
2000 0.00
2001 0
2002 seven.14
2003 25.00
2004 8.33
2005 14.29
2006 0.00
2007 0.00
2008 28.57
2009 9.09
2010 7.69
2011 0.00
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0

Not every commodity in a journal is considered master research and therefore "citable", this nautical chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three twelvemonth windows vs. those documents other than research articles, reviews and briefing papers.

Documents Yr Value
Non-citable documents 1999 0
Non-citable documents 2000 0
Non-citable documents 2001 0
Not-citable documents 2002 0
Not-citable documents 2003 1
Non-citable documents 2004 ii
Non-citable documents 2005 two
Non-citable documents 2006 1
Non-citable documents 2007 i
Non-citable documents 2008 2
Non-citable documents 2009 three
Non-citable documents 2010 3
Not-citable documents 2011 3
Not-citable documents 2012 three
Not-citable documents 2013 two
Non-citable documents 2014 1
Citable documents 1999 24
Citable documents 2000 24
Citable documents 2001 25
Citable documents 2002 17
Citable documents 2003 22
Citable documents 2004 24
Citable documents 2005 36
Citable documents 2006 37
Citable documents 2007 39
Citable documents 2008 42
Citable documents 2009 41
Citable documents 2010 38
Citable documents 2011 35
Citable documents 2012 33
Citable documents 2013 23
Citable documents 2014 11

Ratio of a journal'southward items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those non cited during the following twelvemonth.

Documents Year Value
Uncited documents 1999 x
Uncited documents 2000 10
Uncited documents 2001 18
Uncited documents 2002 nine
Uncited documents 2003 six
Uncited documents 2004 5
Uncited documents 2005 seven
Uncited documents 2006 3
Uncited documents 2007 nine
Uncited documents 2008 ix
Uncited documents 2009 x
Uncited documents 2010 vi
Uncited documents 2011 ten
Uncited documents 2012 xiii
Uncited documents 2013 10
Uncited documents 2014 seven
Cited documents 1999 xiv
Cited documents 2000 xiv
Cited documents 2001 vii
Cited documents 2002 8
Cited documents 2003 17
Cited documents 2004 21
Cited documents 2005 31
Cited documents 2006 35
Cited documents 2007 31
Cited documents 2008 35
Cited documents 2009 34
Cited documents 2010 35
Cited documents 2011 28
Cited documents 2012 23
Cited documents 2013 15
Cited documents 2014 v

Scimago Journal & Country Rank

SCImago Graphica

Explore, visually communicate and make sense of data with our new free tool.
Get information technology

Metrics based on Scopus® data as of April 2021

hardnettspold1949.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=12124&tip=sid

0 Response to "N Annual Review of Information Science and Technology Arist Vol 19 1984 161209"

Postar um comentário

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel